XIAM007

Making Unique Observations in a Very Cluttered World

Saturday 23 July 2011

History Lesson #1: In the 80s, the Gen Xers* were supposed to be the ones willing to end Social Security -

History Lesson #1: In the 80s, the Gen Xers* were supposed to be the ones willing to end Social Security - 




Of course, that was before 30 years of Reaganomics left most of us in much, much worse positions financially than our parents.

My parents didn't have the student loans I do.

My parents didn't have a Depression to live through.

My parents didn't go through 3 periods of longterm unemployment that drained all savings that they had.

My parents had unions pushing wages up.

My parents had Social Security and Medicare and funded Medicaid programs--all on the chopping block now so that the top 2%--including many of the Democratic Party leadership.

My parents had a solid Welfare program that guaranteed if not a good life, at least modest economic security.

My parents never accepted rightwing framing.

My parents center was the center. The current "center", as described by the main stream media, is far, far to the right of the "center" that they knew.

The rules were different in the late 70s and early 80s. The 21st Century is much, much closer to the 1880s. We have Robber Barons and a New Gilded Age. And it sucks as much for anyone not in the top 2% now as it did then.

So when people suggest that the Gen Xers should still be willing to end (or "weaken" or "strengthen" or "swap to a chained CPI" or whatever cow excrement term the PTB are using today) Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid (Welfare being long gone in the modern United States), remember--the rules were changed on us.

It started with "401k"s that were supposed to help us prepare (and before Wall Street Panic after Wall Street Panic reduced the 401k's of everyday people to 201k's and then 101k's and then 0k's). And there was Welfare Reform that shifted Welfare to tax rebates that led to 47% of Americans not paying income taxes and now have led to those 47% being vilified for not carrying their load rather than remembering that this is what was supposed to happen under Welfare "Reform". So now we have a "Democratic" Leadership willing to end that.

40 years of Reaganomics. Bush Sr. was truly right on one thing--Trickle Down is Voodoo Economics. Only far more evil than any actual Voudoun. We've become a harsher, meaner society because the people who were supposed to be protecting us--the "Democratic" Leadership--sold us down the river to endless wage slavery. The precious few who actually fight for the lower 98% get branded in the press as "Liberals", a smear word since 1979. And the popular culture and mainstream media lie to those who really shouldn't need to follow politics as closely as those of us who actually care and tell us that we're being "unreasonable" and "demanding" and "childish" and, get this..."disloyal".

So what do you call people who remain steadfast to the ideals of the Democratic Party ca. 1978? That's right. Now we're the "disloyal" who need to be purged. Those of us who insist that Social Security perhaps could have been ended if society had continued an upward track rather than embarking on a massive downward spiral? "Disloyal". Those of us who fight for our own survival and for those who walk with us who prefer to take care of kids and dogs and daily jobs and chores and grocery shopping? "Disloyal".

And that's the History Lesson for those who actually remember and won't lie.
Read more - 

No comments:

Post a Comment