XIAM007

Making Unique Observations in a Very Cluttered World

Friday, 4 February 2011

China Dumps US Asset Backeds and Corporates - has ordered its reserve managers to divest itself of riskier securities -

China Dumps US Asset Backeds and Corporates - has ordered its reserve managers to divest itself of riskier securities - 




Dollar-denominated risk assets, including asset-backed securities and corporates, are no longer wanted at the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE), nor at China’s large commercial banks. The Chinese government has ordered its reserve managers to divest itself of riskier securities and hold only Treasuries and US agency debt with an implicit or explicit government guarantee. This already has been communicated to American securities dealers, according to market participants with direct knowledge of the events.
It is not clear whether China’s motive is simple risk aversion in the wake of a sharp widening of corporate and mortgage spreads during the past two weeks, or whether there also is a political dimension. With the expected termination of the Federal Reserve’s special facility to purchase mortgage-backed securities next month, some asset-backed spreads already have blown out, and the Chinese institutions may simply be trying to get out of the way of a widening. There is some speculation that China’s action has to do with the recent deterioration of US-Chinese relations over arm sales to Taiwan and other issues. That would be an unusual action for the Chinese to take–Beijing does not mix investment and strategic policy–and would be hard to substantiate in any event.


Thursday, 3 February 2011

Mexico cancels offer to send electricity to Texas - because of severe cold in Mexico's own territory -

Mexico cancels offer to send electricity to Texas - because of severe cold in Mexico's own territory - 


Mexico said Thursday it was temporarily suspending an offer to provide electricity to Texas to help the U.S. state weather an ice storm that forced rolling blackouts, because of severe cold in Mexico's own territory.
Mexico's Federal Electricity Commission had said Wednesday it had agreed to transmit 280 megawatts of electricity to Texas.
But on Thursday, the commission said it was temporarily suspending the transfer because below-freezing temperatures in northern Mexico had affected the generating capacity of some its own plants, causing a reduction of about 1,000 megawatts in generation.
The commission also said Mexico needed to ensure there was enough electricity to meet domestic demand, in the face of a severe cold snap that dumped snow on the border city of Ciudad Juarez, across from El Paso, Texas.
The National Meteorological Service said wind chill in Ciudad Juarez could drop to minus-4 degrees (-20 Celsius). It said the cold front could also send snow into other border cities, including Matamoros, ReynosaNuevo Laredo, to the east of Ciudad Juarez, over the coming week.
The service said the front could also cause storms along Mexico's Gulf coast.
In Texas, rolling blackouts have been implemented, including in Super Bowl host city Dallas, due to high demand during the rare ice storm.

Bernanke Says Debt Limit Not a ‘Bargaining Chip’ - $14.3T debt ceiling “not something you want to play around with`` -

Bernanke Says Debt Limit Not a ‘Bargaining Chip’ -  $14.3T debt ceiling “not something you want to play around with`` - 




The Federal Reserve chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, warned Congressional Republicans on Thursday not to “play around with” a coming vote to raise the government’s legal borrowing limit or use it as a bargaining chip for spending cuts.
In remarks after a luncheon speech here, Mr. Bernanke sided with the Obama administration in the fight over the debt ceiling, which the government is on course to hit in April or May, saying it should be raised without conditions. Some Republicans have insisted on immediate spending cuts in exchange for raising the limit.
It was the first time that Mr. Bernanke, who in contrast to his predecessors has avoided taking sides in partisan debates on fiscal matters, had spoken out on the debt ceiling issue. His willingness to do so suggested a desire by the central bank to prevent Washington lawmakers from toying with bond markets that have been volatile since the European debt crisis last year.
House Republicans have vowed to make deep spending cuts a precondition for voting to lift the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling. The White House has described raising the ceiling as nonnegotiable, saying that spending cuts and tax increases should be considered separately. The increasingly tense debate has left Republican leaders, like the new House speaker, John A. Boehner, in a politically delicate spot.
Though he called on Congress and Mr. Obama to confront “daunting fiscal challenges,” Mr. Bernanke said the debt ceiling should not be used as a negotiating tactic, warning that even the possibility of the United States not being able to pay its creditors could create panic in the debt markets.
“I think this is very remote, but it’s not something you want to play around with — the United States would be forced into a position of defaulting on its debt,” Mr. Bernanke said. “And the implications of that for our financial system, for our fiscal policy, for our economy would be catastrophic.”
He added: “So I would very much urge Congress not to focus on the debt limit as being the bargaining chip in this discussion, but rather to address directly the spending and tax issues that we all have to deal with if we’re going to make progress on this fiscal situation.”
Mr. Bernanke’s remarks, which were made in response to questions at a luncheon at the National Press Club, underscored once again his delicate position as a moderate Republican economics professor who was appointed by President George W. Bush but won a second term last year with support from Mr. Obama and Congressional Democrats.
Mr. Bernanke also expressed urgency about fiscal reform, in terms of deficit spending, saying, “There is only so far that we can kick the can down the road.”
He said, “We have to address this. And the sooner we do it, the less painful it will be and the better it will be for our economy.”
In his prepared speech, Mr. Bernanke said the United States could not rely on economic growth to solve its long-term fiscal problems, emphasizing that the country would have to cut spending, raise taxes or both.
But as before, Mr. Bernanke declined to specify how the deficit — about 9 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product each of the last two years — should be reduced.
He did, however, say that plans offered recently by a presidentially appointed fiscal commission and by other prominent groups “provide useful starting points for a much-needed national conversation.” Those plans have called for revising entitlement programs like Medicare and Social Security and increasing tax revenue, though they differ on many specifics.
Mr. Bernanke’s increasingly urgent warnings about the deficit have been welcomed by Republicans, but on Thursday he also indicated support for Mr. Obama’s position that the debate over fiscal policy should take into account the need to improve the nation’s economic competitiveness.
Mr. Bernanke said that tax and spending changes should “serve not only to reduce the deficit, but also to enhance the long-term growth potential of our economy — for example, by reducing disincentives to work and to save, by encouraging investment in the skills of our work force as well as in new machinery and equipment, by promoting research and development, and by providing necessary public infrastructure.”
Mr. Bernanke also reiterated his defense of the Fed’s plan to lower long-term interest rates by buying $600 billion in Treasury securities. He called the bond-buying plan, which began in November and is to last through June, an appropriate response to high unemployment and low inflation.
Since August, when the Fed first signaled it was considering the strategy, Mr. Bernanke said, stock prices have “risen significantly,” inflation expectations have remained fairly steady, and interest rates on corporate bonds have fallen relative to yields on comparable Treasury securities, suggesting that investors are more confident about the outlook for businesses and less worried about the risk of defaults.
Critics say the effort — popularly known as QE2 because it is the second round of the bond-buying strategy known as quantitative easing — could touch off future inflation in the United States and abroad, devalue the dollarand increase the cost of food, energy and other commodities in the developing world.
Mr. Bernanke said the United States was not to blame for inflation in emerging economies, which have been growing at a much faster rate than the rich economies of Western Europe, North America and Japan.
The inflationary pressures, Mr. Bernanke said, arise from long-term trends — like the tendency of consumers to eat better as they move up from poverty, which tends to push up food prices — and suggest that some economies are pushing the limits of their capacity for growth.
He said that “emerging markets have all the tools they need to address excess demand in those countries,” and added, “They can adjust their exchange rates, which is something that they’ve been reluctant to do in some cases.”
That was a clear reference to China, which has managed the value of its currency, the renminbi, in relation to the dollar.
On the eve of new unemployment figures for January that the Labor Department will report Friday, Mr. Bernanke predicted that “we’ll start seeing some stronger payroll reports and some lower unemployment rates pretty soon,” but cautioned that it would take years for the job market to return to normal.
He said that uncertainty about the recovery’s durability was hampering firms from hiring. “Firms have been using a lot of temporary workers, because they can bring temporary workers on and if the economy weakens again, they can let them go,” he said. “It’ll be a really good sign when we see those temporary jobs being converted into permanent jobs.”

Wednesday, 2 February 2011

Federal Reserve has surpassed China as the leading holder of US Treasury securities - By June will hold $1,600bn -

Federal Reserve has surpassed China as the leading holder of US Treasury securities - By June will hold $1,600bn - 






The Federal Reserve has surpassed China as the leading holder of US Treasury securities even though it has yet to reach the halfway mark in its latest round of quantitative easing, according to official figures.


Based on weekly data released on Thursday, the New York Fed’s holdings of Treasuries in its System Open Market Account, known as Soma, total $1,108bn, made up of bills, notes, bonds and Treasury Inflation Protected Securities, or Tips.


According to the most recent US Treasury data on foreign holders of US government paper, China holds $896bn and Japan owns $877bn.


“By June [the Fed] will have accumulated some $1,600bn of Treasury securities, likely to be in the vicinity of China and Japan’s combined holdings,” said Richard Gilhooly, a strategist at TD Securities. “The New York Fed surpassed China in the past month as the largest holder of US Treasury securities,” he noted.


The Fed is buying Treasury debt under two programmes. The largest is QE2, which began in November and is scheduled to involve $600bn of purchases by June.


It is also buying $30bn of Treasuries a month as it reinvests principal payments from its large holdings of mortgage debt and debt issued by government housing agencies – a programme dubbed QE lite.


By the end of June, the Fed plans to buy $800bn in Treasury debt under both programmes. Since November, the Fed has purchased $284bn of Treasuries.


The Fed has devoted 67 per cent of its QE2 purchases to Treasuries with a maturity of four-and-a-half to 10 years. That has helped pull back yields in that part of the yield curve from their highs of December.


By contrast, just 5 per cent of the Fed’s buying has been for Treasury debt longer than 17 years. Last Friday, the yield on 30-year bonds briefly rose to its highest level since last April.


“The end of QE2 will be a big test as rates are likely to rise once the Fed stops buying large amounts of Treasuries,” said David Ader, a strategist at CRT Capital. “We don’t know if that means a rise of 20, 30 or even 50 basis points for key yields.”


In total, foreign central banks hold $2,604bn of Treasuries, according to the Fed. After rising from $2,250bn at the end of last June, foreign central banks have stayed at about $2,600bn since mid-November, when the Fed began QE2. This indicates the Fed has stepped up as other central banks have scaled back their Treasuries purchases.


Before the financial crisis, the Fed held $775bn of Treasuries in Soma. That was reduced by $300bn during the first half of 2008, when the Fed sold Treasuries and focused on supporting the financial system. The first QE program, which began in 2009, saw the Fed buy $300bn of Treasuries.


Read more - http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/120372fc-2e48-11e0-8733-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1Coiu97oq

Tuesday, 1 February 2011

US Mint Sells Absolute Record 6.4 Million Ounces Of Silver In January, 50% More Than Previous Highest Month -

US Mint Sells Absolute Record 6.4 Million Ounces Of Silver In January, 50% More Than Previous Highest Month -



As the topic of US Mint silver sales is not new to our readers, after we first brought attention to the record January sales by the Mint, we will not dwell much on it, suffice to say that the final January tally is in. And at 6,472,000 ounces, this is nearly 50% higher than any prior month in the Mint's 26 years of published sales history. This has occurred, despite supposed profit taking in the paper silver market in January. And just today, another 50k, were sold. It seems that physical buyers continue to enjoy the dip in paper silver that is providing them with an attractive entry point.


Read more - http://www.zerohedge.com/article/us-mint-sells-absolute-record-64-million-ounces-silver-january-50-more-previous-highest-mont

Microsoft's Bing Caught Copying Google Search Results - AND Bing has all but admitted the claim -

Microsoft's Bing Caught Copying Google Search Results - AND Bing has all but admitted the claim - 


At left, Google searched for the correct spelling of "tarsorrhaphy" even though "torsoraphy" was entered. Bing manages to list the same Wikipedia entry at the top of its results.





A sting operation by Google reveals that Microsoft has been copying results from Google for its Bing search engine.


The search giant alleges that Microsoft has been using its Internet Explorer web browser and the Bing Search bar to harvest information on Google users, according to a lengthy report by Danny Sullivan at Search Engine Land. Amit Singhal, a Google Fellow who oversees the search engine’s ranking algorithm, was crystal clear about the findings. 


“Our testing has concluded that Bing is copying Google web search results,” Singhal told FoxNews.com.


It’s a serious allegation from the world’s most popular search engine, a company that takes pride in the quality of its product.


"I've spent my career in pursuit of a good search engine," Singhal told Search Engine Land. "I've got no problem with a competitor developing an innovative algorithm. But copying is not innovation, in my book."


Bing, although denying that they outright copy results, and has all but admitted the claim. Director of Bing Stefan Weitz told FoxNews.com that the strategy is one of many that Microsoft uses to provide the best search results.
“We use multiple signals and approaches in ranking search results,” Weitz said. “The overarching goal is to do a better job determining the intent of the search so we can provide the most relevant answer to a given query.”
Harry Shum, corporate vice president at Bing, spoke at a company event Tuesday, furthering these sentiments. “It’s not like we actually copy anything,” Shum said at the event. He claimed that competitors such as Google employ similar tactics. “We use the customer data to help improve the search experience.”
Google is understandably vexed. The company grew wary of potential copycats in October 2010 when engineers noticed that bizarre misspellings were returning the same set of results on both Google and Bing searches.
Unsure, but suspicious, Google set up a trap. From December 17 to December 31, engineers inserted a “honeypot” result as the top result for specific search queries -- including, hiybbprqag, mbzrxpgiys, and indoswiftjobinproduction -- and waited to see if the same results would appear on Bing. Lo and behold, the identical results popped up.
"It's cheating to me because we work incredibly hard and have done so for years -- but they just get there based on our hard work,” a frustrated Singhal told Sullivan. “I don't know how else to call it but plain and simple cheating. Another analogy is that it's like running a marathon and carrying someone else on your back, who jumps off just before the finish line."
On the official Bing blog, Shum called the Google ploy a “spy-novelesque stunt,” a “creative tactic by a competitor, that Bing was actually taking as a back-handed compliment.” 
“It doesn’t accurately portray how we use opt-in customer data as one of many inputs to help improve our user experience,” Shum wrote.
It's difficult to say how this discovery will affect the search experience for consumers, Sullivan told FoxNews.com, because we really don't know the extent of Bing's usage of Google data.
”It potentially makes the search engines more the same,” he allowed, “and my gut feeling is that we want them to have some differentiation. That's because being more Google-like isn't a guarantee that you're necessarily improving results.”




Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/02/01/microsofts-bing-caught-copying-google-search-results/#ixzz1CkpJ37ih



Monday, 31 January 2011

Nearly 11 Percent of US Houses Empty - There were 18.4 million vacant homes in the U.S. in Q4 '10 -

Nearly 11 Percent of US Houses Empty - There were 18.4 million vacant homes in the U.S. in Q4 '10 - 



I usually find the quarterly homeowner vacancy and homeownership report from Census pretty lackluster, but the latest one released this morning was anything but.

America's home ownership rate, after holding steady for a while, took a pretty big plunge in Q4, from 66.9 percent to 66.5 percent. That's down from the 2004 peak of 69.2 percent and the lowest level since 1998.
Homeownership is falling at an alarming pace, despite the fact that home prices have fallen, affordability is much improved and inventories of new and existing homes are still running quite high.
Bargains abound, but few are interested or eligible to take advantage.
More concerning than the home ownership rate is the vacancy rate. The Census tables don't tell the entire story, but they tell a lot of it. Of the nearly 131 million housing units in this country, 112.5 million are occupied. 74.8 million are owned, and that's only dropped by about 30 thousand in the past year. 38 million are rented, but that's up by over a million year over year. That means more new households are choosing to rent.
Now to vacancies. There were 18.4 million vacant homes in the U.S. in Q4 '10 (11 percent of all housing units vacant all year round), which is actually an improvement of 427,000 from a year ago, but not for the reasons you'd think.
The number of vacant homes for rent fell by 493 thousand, as rental demand rose. 471,000 homes are listed as "Held off Market" about half for temporary use, but the other half are likely foreclosures. And no, the shadow inventory isn't just 200,000, it's far higher than that.

  • Slideshow: 10 U.S. Cities Where Renting Beats Buying



  • So think about it. Eleven percent of the houses in America are empty. This as builders start to get more bullish, and renting apartments becomes ever more popular. Vacancies in the apartment sector have been falling steadily and dramatically, why? Because we're still recovering emotionally from the toll of the housing crash.
    Younger Americans have seen what home ownership has done to their friends and families, and many want no part of it. Credit has become very nearly elitist. Home prices, whatever your particular data provider preference might be, are still falling.
    Banks, Fannie [FNM  0.487    -0.003  (-0.61%)   ] and Freddie [FRE  3.26    0.01 (+0.31%)   ] are holding on to hundreds of thousands of properties, and we don't know exactly when or how they'll sell them.

    China's state broadcaster CCTV Tries to Pass Off a scene from the movie "Top Gun" as Real News footage of a Chinese J-10 -

    China's state broadcaster CCTV Tries to Pass Off a scene from the movie "Top Gun" as Real News footage of a Chinese J-10 -

    Sunday, 30 January 2011

    China central bank says Fed easing ineffective and dangerous - may lead to competitive currency depreciation -

    China central bank says Fed easing ineffective and dangerous - may lead to competitive currency depreciation -



    Quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve and other central banks cannot address fundamental economic problems but may lead to excessive global liquidity and competitive currency depreciation, China's central bank said on Sunday.
    In its monetary policy report for the final quarter of 2010, the People's Bank of China (PBOC) also confirmed that it would target 16 percent growth of the broad M2 measure of money supply this year, down from the 19.9 pct growth recorded at the end of 2010.
    The central bank said the Fed's monetary easing was pushing up international commodity prices and asset prices in emerging markets, including China.
    "Quantitative easing policy cannot fundamentally address economic problems, and it may cause excessive liquidity on a global scale as well as risks of competitive currency depreciation," the Chinese central bank said in its 59-page report.
    "It is creating imported inflation and short-term capital inflows, pressuring emerging markets," it said.
    As a result, China needed to work hard to soak up liquidity from foreign exchange inflows in order to minimize the impact on the domestic economy, it added.
    The central bank reiterated that it would keep the yuan basically stable while making the exchange rate regime more flexible.
    The central bank said it would continue to use different tools, including interest rates, bank reserve requirements and open-market operations, to rein in money supply and bank credit growth as a way of handling inflationary pressure.

    Wednesday, 26 January 2011

    Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Slams Greenspan, Bernanke, Geithner, Paulson, Summers, SEC, etc... for Causing Crisis -

    Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Slams Greenspan, Bernanke, Geithner, Paulson, Summers, SEC, etc... for Causing Crisis -


    The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission is releasing its report Thursday.

    The New York Times has a preview of the report, which shows that the Commission will slam the right people for causing the financial crisis.
    Barry Ritholtz gives a good summary of the Times’ article:
    The many causal factors highlighted in the FCIC report:
    • Alan Greenspan’s malfeasance — his refusal to perform his regulatory duties because he did not believe in them — allowed the credit bubble to expand, driving housing prices to dangerously unsustainable levels; Greenspan’s advocacy for financial deregulation was a “pivotal failure to stem the flow of toxic mortgages” and “the prime example” of government negligence;
    • Ben S. Bernanke failed to foresee the crisis;
    • The Bush administration’s “inconsistent response” — saving Bear, but allowing Lehman to crater — “added to the uncertainty and panic in the financial markets.”
    • Bush Treasury secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. wrongly predicted in 2007 that subprime meltdown would be contained.
    • The Clinton White House, including then Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, made a crucial error in “shielding over-the-counter derivatives from regulation [CFMA]. This was “a key turning point in the march toward the financial crisis.”
    • Then NY Fed President, now Treasury secretary Timothy F. Geithner failed to “clamp down on excesses by Citigroup in the lead-up to the crisis;” Further, a month before Lehman’s collapse, Geithner was still in the dark about Lehman’s derivative exposure;
    • Low interest rates brought about by the Fed after the 2001 recession “created increased risks” but were not chiefly to blame, according to the FCIC (I place some more weight on Ultra-low rates than they do);
    • The financial sector spent $2.7 billion on lobbying from 1999 to 2008, while individuals and committees affiliated with the industry made more than $1 billion in campaign contributions. The impact of which an incestuous relationship between bankers and regulators, Congress and bankers, and classic regulatory capture by the industry.
    • The credit-rating agencies “cogs in the wheel of financial destruction.”
    • The Securities and Exchange Commission allowed the 5 biggest banks to ramp up their leverage, hold insufficient capital, and engage in risky practices.
    • Leverage at the nation’s five largest investment banks was wildly excessive: They kept only $1 in capital to cover losses for about every $40 in assets;
    • The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency along with the Office of Thrift Supervision, “federally pre-empted” (blocked) state regulators from reining in lending abuses;
    • The report documents “questionable practices by mortgage lenders and careless betting by banks;”
    • The report portrays the “bumbling incompetence among corporate chieftains” as to the risk and operations of their own firms:
    -Citigroup executives admitting that they paid little attention to the risks associated with mortgage securities.
    -AIG executives were blind to its $79 billion exposure to credit default swaps;
    -Merrill Lynch top managers were surprised when mortgage investments suddenly resulted in billions of dollars in losses;


    I certainly agree with all of these points, and have criticized these same players in the past.

    It should be noted that leading banking analyst Chris Whalen – who I greatly respect –agrees with FCIC Commissioner Peter Wallison (co-director of the American Enterprise Institute’s program on financial policy studies) that Freddie and Fannie were a leading cause for the crisis. This is the minority view of the FCIC.
    Many people – including me – have criticized the FCIC for seeming to sidestep the massive fraud which was a core cause of the crisis. However, the Commission hasindicated that it will make criminal referrals. We’ll have to wait and see if the referrals are for big or small fish.